147 – Digital engagement in Russian anti-war movements

In this episode, we speak with Svetlana Chuikina, researcher in Media and Communication Studies. Her doctoral thesis examines anti-war activism, public engagement and media technologies in contemporary Russia. Drawing on the concept of infrastructuring, understood as the interplay between technologies and user practices, her research explores how counterpublics emerge and operate within an increasingly militarised and authoritarian environment.

Based on extensive interviews with activists and members of the broader public, complemented by ethnographic fieldwork, Svetlana Chuikina’s thesis present several important findings. It shows how people actively negotiate both the opportunities and limitations of media platforms in their everyday lives and activist practices. Her research also develops the concept of distributed attention to explain how actors compete for and sustain public attention in a hostile environment characterised by state control, censorship and surveillance.

In our discussion, Svetlana offers valuable insights into the relationship between technology, political resistance and public life, highlighting the ways in which people use digital infrastructures to maintain spaces for collective action under authoritarian conditions.

Svetlana Chuikina’s doctoral thesis can be downloaded from DiVA: Infrastructuring Counterpublics: Digital Engagement and Distributed Attention in Russian Anti-War Movements

137 – AI, News, and the State

How are emerging AI technologies affecting and reshaping journalism and the journalist profession? This is the fundamental question for Media and Communication scholar Joanne Kuai’s doctoral thesis. Joanne’s research investigates global power shifts and institutional challenges from AI’s integration into journalism, focusing on China with comparisons to the US and EU. In our conversation, Joanne explains AI’s impact on media-state-tech relations, journalism labour, platformisation, and copyright. She also argues for the need of a more complex understanding of Chinese journalism. Joanne Kuai’s research offers insights for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers invested in contemporary journalism.

Joanne Kuai’s doctoral thesis can be downloaded from DiVA: AI, News, and the State: Reinstitutionalising Journalism in Global China’s Algorithmic Age

99 – Free and open source software

LibreOffice is an office suite that can be downloaded, used, shared, modified and redistributed freely. It is available for most operating systems, including Mac OS and Windows, and estimated to have 200 million active users worldwide. It is one of the largest and longstanding free and open source software projects.

In his ethnographic study, Reinhard Handler investigates the collaborative practices that forms LibreOffice. With the aim to understand how collaborative practices emerge, are negotiated and ordered in the context of free and open source software, he has followed collaborators at conferences, interviewed them, and participated in their discussions. In our conversation, Reinhard describes and explains the interplay of ethical ideas, technical skills, and governance mechanisms that together form LibreOffice as a software project.

Reinhard Handler’s doctoral thesis can be downloaded from DiVA: Colliberate : The practices of free and open source software

79 – The Public Interest in the Data Society

The public interest, in its ideal form, offers the possibility for all to exercise individual rights and freedoms, such as freedom of expression and information or the right to personal data protection. However, in practice the definition of public interest can vary depending on the context.

In Maud Bernisson’s doctoral thesis in Media and Communication Studies, she investigates how the notion of public interest was constructed in relation to digital media during the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) policymaking process. By interviewing key actors of the process, along with extensive in-depth document analyses, Maud’s research shows that the GDPR redefines the public interest in a way which diverges from its ideal form. In our conversation, Maud explains the reasons for this divergence and how it has affected how the GDPR works for EU citizens.     

Maud Bernisson’s doctoral thesis can be downloaded from DiVA: The Public Interest in the Data Society: Deconstructing the Policy Network Imaginary of the GDPR